Theoretical Insight into Preferential Interaction Issues and Solution Structure, and Contentious Apparent Hydrated Molar Volume of Cosolute

Main Article Content

Ikechukwu Iloh Udema
Abraham Olalere Onigbinde


Background: There seems to be a mathematical or a conceptual error in an equation whose substitution into other equations for the determination of an apparent hydrated molar volume (V1) of a cosolute leads to an incorrect answer.

Objectives: The objectives are 1) To show theoretically that the preferential interaction parameter (PIP) is an extensive thermodynamic quantity, 2) rederive new equations and reexamine various equations related to solution structure, 3) apply derived equation for the determination of V1, and 4) determine m-values and cognate preferential interaction parameter (PIP).

Methods: The research is mainly theoretical and partly experimental. Bernfeld method of enzyme assay was adopted for the generation of data.

Results and Discussion: The investigation showed that equation linking chemical potential of osmolyte to solution structure is dimensionally invalid; PIP was seen as a thermodynamically extensive quantity. Equations for the graphical determination of V1 of the osmolyte were derived. With ethanol alone, there were  - m-value and + PIP; with aspirin alone, there were  + m-value and - PIP. There was a change in sign in m-value with sucrose and ethanol/aspirin mixture, and a change in sign in PIP when the latter is taken as function of [ethanol]/[aspirin] and [sucrose](c3).

Conclusion: A solution structure is as usual determined by either a relative excess or a deficit of the solution component either in the bulk or around the macromolecular surface domain; the PIP remains thermodynamically an extensive quantity. To be valid there is a need to introduce a reference standard molar concentration or activity to some equations in literature. The slope Capture3.PNG  from one of the equations seems to give a valid value for V1 (V1 is «1;  is activity coefficient). A known destabiliser may behave as a stabiliser being excluded. Like ethanol, aspirin as cosolute is destabilising and opposed by sucrose.

Porcine pancreatic alpha amylase, preferential interaction parameter, apparent hydrated molar volume, m – value; Kirkwood-Buff integrals, ethanol, aspirin, sucrose.

Article Details

How to Cite
Udema, I., & Onigbinde, A. (2019). Theoretical Insight into Preferential Interaction Issues and Solution Structure, and Contentious Apparent Hydrated Molar Volume of Cosolute. Asian Journal of Research in Biochemistry, 5(2), 1-21.
Original Research Article


Schurr JM, Rangel DP, Aragon SR. A contribution to the theory of preferential coefficients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;89:2258–2276.

Bruździak P, Panuszko A, Jourdan M, Strangret JP. Protein thermal stabilization in aqueous solutions of osmolytes. Acta. Biochim. Pol. 2016;63(1):65-70.

Rösgen J, Pettit MB, Bolen DW. Protein folding, stability, and solvation structure in osmolyte solution. Biophys. J. 2005;89: 2988–2997.

Schellman JA. The thermodynamics of solvent exchange. Biopolymers. 1994;34: 1015–1026.

Parsegian VA, Rand RP, Rau DC. Macromolecules and water: Probing with osmotic stress. Methods Enzymol. 1995; 259:43–94.

Eisenberg H. Protein and nucleic-acid hydration and cosolvent interactions: Establishment of reliable base-line values at high cosolvent concentrations. Biophys. Chem. 1994;53:57–68.

Rösgen JB, Pettitt M, Bolen DW. An analysis of the molecular origin of osmolyte- dependent protein stability. Protein Sci. 2007;16:733 –743.

Miyawaki O, Saito A, Matsuo T, Nakamura K. Activity and activity coefficients of water in aqueous solutions and their relation-ships with solution structure parameters. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 1977;61(3): 466-469.

Timasheff SN. Protein solvent preferential interaction, protein hydration, and the modulation of biochemical reactions by solvent components. Biochemistry. 2002; 99(15):9721-9726.

Arakawa T, Timasheff SN. Mechanism of protein’s salting-in and salting-out by divalent salts: Balance between hydration and salt binding. Biochemistry. 1984; 23(25):5912-5923.

Damadaran S. Electrodynamic pressure modulation of protein stability in cosolvent. Biochemistry. 2013;52(46):8363-8373.

Harano Y, Kinoshita M. Translational-entropy gain of the solvent upon protein folding. Biophys. J. 2005;89:2701-2710.

Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990;31(29):7133-7140.

Shimizu S. Estimating hydration changes upon bimolecular reactions from osmotic stress, high pressure, and preferential hydration experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:1155–1199.

Udema II, Onigbinde AO. Basic kirkwood – buff theory of solution structure and appropriate application of Wyman linkage equation to biochemical phenomena. Asian J. Phys. Chem. Sci. 2019;7(1):1-14.

Udema II, Onigbinde AO. Activity coefficient of solution components and salts as special osmolyte from Kirkwood-Buff theoretical perspective. Asian Res. Biochem. 2019;4(3):1-20.

Poklar N, Lah N, Oblak M, Vesnaver G. Thermodynamic stability of ribonuclease. A at 25°C in aqueous solutions of guanidine hydrochloride, urea and alkyureas. Acta Chimica. Slovenia. 1999;46(3):315-321.

Udema II. In vitro investigation into the effects of ethanol, aspirin, and stabilisers on mesophilic alpha amylase. Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma; Thesis; 2013.

Marcelo L, Holthauzen F, Bolen DW. Mixed osmolytes: The degree to which one osmolyte affects the protein stabilising ability of another. Protein Sci. 2007;16: 293-298.

Harries D, Rösgen J. Use of macroscopic properties of solution to derive microscope structural information. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;84:680–730.

Bernfeld P. Amylases, alpha and beta. Methods. Enzymol. 1955;1:149–152.

Levine IN. Physical chemistry Peterson, K.A. and Oberbroeckling, S.R. (Eds) 5th Ed. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY10020. 2002;299-303.

Sirotkin VA, Kuchierskaya AA. Alpha-chymotrypsin in water-ethanol mixtures: Effect of preferential interactions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017;689:156-161.

Kurkal V, Daniel RM, Finney JL, Tehei M, Dunn RV, Smith JC. Enzyme activity and flexibility at very low hydration. Biophys. J. 2005;89:1282-1287.

Affleck R, Xu ZF, Suzawa V, Focht K, Clark DS, Enzymatic catalysis and dynamics in low-water environments. Biochemistry. 1992;89:1100-1104.

Schneider CP, Trout BL. Investigation of cosolute-protein preferential interaction coefficients: New insight into the mechanism by which arginine inhibits aggregation. J. Phys. Chem B. 2009; 113(7):2050-2058.

Singh LR, Podder NK, Dar TA, Kumar R, Ahmad F. Protein and DNA destabilisation by osmolytes: The other side of the coin. Life Sci. 2011;88:117–125.

Lee JC, Timasheff SN. The stabilisation of proteins by sucrose J. Biol. Chem. 1981; 256(14):7193-7196.

Petukhov M, Rychkov G, Firsov L, Serrano L. H-bonding in protein hydration revisited. Protein Sci. 2004;13(8):22120-2129.

Kendrick BS, Chang BS, Arakawa T, Peterson B, Randalph TW, Manning MC, et al. Preferential exclusion of sucrose from recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: Role in restricted confor-mational mobility and compaction of native state. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 1997; 94:11917-11920.

Anuradha SN, Prakash V. Structural stabilisation of bovine β-Lactoglobuline in presence of polyhydric alcohols. Ind. J. Biotechnol. 2008;437-447.

Baskakov I, Bolen DW. Forcing thermo-dynamically unfolded proteins to fold (communication). J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273(9):1-5.

D’Amico S, Marx JC, Gerday C, Feller G. Activity-stability relationship in extre-mophilic enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278(10):7891-7896.

Cipolla A, Delbrassine F, Da Lag JC, Feller G. Temperature adaptations in psychro-philic, mesophilic and thermophilic chloride dependent alpha amylase. Biochemie. 2012;94(9):1943-1950.

Pace CN. Measuring and increasing protein stability. Trends Biotechnol; 1990.