Effect of pH, Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on Antibiotic Production by Actinomycetes Isolates from River Tana and Lake Elementaita, Kenya

Bonface O. Shikuku *

Department of Physical Sciences, Chuka Universities, P.O. Box 109-60400, Chuka, Kenya.

Silas Kiruki

Department of Physical Sciences, Chuka Universities, P.O. Box 109-60400, Chuka, Kenya.

Eric Kuria

Department of Biological Sciences, Chuka Universities, P.O. Box 109-60400, Chuka, Kenya.

Domnic Mayo

Department of Animal Sciences, Chuka Universities, P.O. Box 109-60400, Chuka, Kenya.

Fredrick O. Ogolla

Department of Biological Sciences, Chuka Universities, P.O. Box 109-60400, Chuka, Kenya.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The escalating concern over antibiotic resistance and its profound impact on public health have underscored the urgent need to explore alternative reservoirs of antimicrobial agents. In this regard, Actinomycetes have emerged as a compelling area of investigation due to their remarkable capacity to produce bioactive compounds. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the influence of pH and various carbon and nitrogen sources on the antibacterial activity of Actinomycetes isolates collected from Lake Elementaita and River Tana. By examining the effects of these factors, we aimed to gain insights into the optimization of growth conditions and nutrient availability to enhance the production of bioactive compounds with potent antibacterial properties. The Actinomycetes isolates used in this study were from Lake Elementaita and River Tana, known for their diverse ecological characteristics and potential as sources of bioactive compounds. The isolates were subjected to morphological, biochemical, and molecular techniques to ensure accurate identification. To assess the antibacterial activity of the Actinomycetes isolates, they were tested against E. coli using the agar well diffusion method. The independent variables examined in this study were pH levels (4, 7, and 9) as well as different carbon sources (fructose and sucrose) and nitrogen sources (urea and sodium nitrate). The diameter of the inhibition zones served as the dependent variable. The data collected on the effects of pH and nutrients on the inhibition zones of Actinomycetes isolates were subjected to statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA was performed to assess significant differences in antibacterial activity among the isolates under different carbon and nitrogen preference. Mean values were compared using the LSD test at a significance level (α) of 0.05. Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to analyze the pH preferences of the Actinomycetes isolates at a significance level (α) of 0.05. The results showed that pH significantly influenced the bioactivity of the Actinomycetes isolates, with pH 7 exhibiting the highest inhibition zones against E. coli. The isolates displayed varied antibacterial activities depending on the carbon and nitrogen sources provided. Sucrose was the most preferred carbon source, followed by fructose, while urea was the preferred nitrogen source, followed by sodium nitrate. The study concluded that pH and nutrient availability play crucial roles in determining the antibacterial activity of Actinomycetes isolates. Other than contributing to our in-depth understanding of the factors influencing the antimicrobial potential of Actinomycetes, the results of this study highlight the importance of optimizing growth conditions and nutrient availability to enhance the production of bioactive compounds with potent antibacterial properties. Further investigations and exploration of Actinomycetes from diverse environments are recommended to discover new bioactive molecules for combating antibiotic resistance.

Keywords: Actinomycetes, antibacterial activity, pH, carbon, sources


How to Cite

Shikuku , B. O., Kiruki , S., Kuria , E., Mayo , D., & Ogolla , F. O. (2023). Effect of pH, Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on Antibiotic Production by Actinomycetes Isolates from River Tana and Lake Elementaita, Kenya. Asian Journal of Research in Biochemistry, 13(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrb/2023/v13i1248

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chinemerem Nwobodo D, Ugwu MC, Oliseloke Anie C, Al-Ouqaili MTS, Chinedu Ikem J, Victor Chigozie U et al. Antibiotic resistance: the challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(9): e24655.

Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629-55.

Nwabuife JC, Omolo CA, Govender T. ’Nano delivery systems to the rescue of ciprofloxacin against resistant bacteria “E. coli; P. aeruginosa; S aureus; and MRSA’ and their infections. J Control Release. 2022;349:338-53.

Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3): 318-27.

Mutua J, Njeru J, Musyoki A. Multidrug resistant bacterial infections in severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted in a national referral and teaching hospital, Kenya. BioMed Cent Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):1-12.

Selim MSM, Abdelhamid SA, Mohamed SS. Secondary metabolites and biodiversity of actinomycetes. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):72.

Silva GDC, Kitano IT, Ribeiro IADF, Lacava PT. The potential use of actinomycetes as microbial inoculants and biopesticides in agriculture. Front Soil Sci. 2022;2.

Hobson C, Chan AN, Wright GD. The antibiotic resistome: a guide for the discovery of natural products as antimicrobial agents. Chem Rev. 2021; 121(6):3464-94.

Rao K, Mani B. Satyanarayana and T. Rao, Purification and structural elucidation of three bioactive compounds isolated from Streptomyces coelicoflavus BC 01 and their biological activity. Biotechnology. 2017;7(1):1-10.

Ibnouf EO. Screening of O-7 Isolate Actinomycete Producing Antimicrobials in Different Growth Conditions against Selected Pathogens. IJPPR. 2021;11(2): 13-23.

Kurnianto MA, Kusumaningrum HD, Lioe HN. Characterization of Streptomyces isolates associated with estuarine fish Chanos Chanos and profiling of their antibacterial metabolites-crude-extract. Int J Microbiol. 2020;2020:8851947.

Ripa FA, Nikkon F, Zaman S, Khondkar P. Optimal conditions for antimicrobial metabolites production from a new Streptomyces sp. RUPA-08PR isolated from Bangladeshi soil. Mycobiology. 2009;37(3):211-4.

Tabbene O, Slimene IB, Djebali K, Mangoni ML, Urdaci MC, Limam F. Optimization of medium composition for the production of antimicrobial activity by Bacillus subtilis B38. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25(5):1267-74.

Kumar A, Asthana M, Gupta A, Nigam D, Mahajan S. Secondary metabolism and antimicrobial metabolites of Penicillium. New Future Dev Microb Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018:47-68.

Také A, Matsumoto A, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Streptomyces lactacystinicus sp. nov. and Streptomyces cyslabdanicus sp. nov., producing lactacystin and cyslabdan, respectively. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2015;68(5):322-7.

Sholkamy EN, Muthukrishnan P, Abdel-Raouf N, Nandhini X, Ibraheem IBM, Mostafa AA. Antimicrobial and antinematicidal metabolites from Streptomyces cuspidosporus strain SA4 against selected pathogenic bacteria, fungi and nematode. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(12):3208-20.

Rekha M, Suresh P, Shanmugaiah V, Gomathinayagam S. Endophytic isolate Streptomyces sp. VSMKU1023 as an effective microbe for the resistance and sensitivity of heavy metal, fungicide and antibiotics. J Adv Microbiol Res. 2021;2(2):46-52.

Adeyemo OM, Onilude AA, Babatola LJ. Effect of production parameters and inhibitory activity of antimicrobial compounds produced by co-cultured strains of Streptomyces xinghaiensis-OY62 and S. rimosus-OG95. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2020;32(1):294-301.

Njogu J. Wildlife management and conservation in view of international conventions. George Wright Forum. 2012;29(1):109-17.

Singh LS, Sharma H, Talukdar NC. Production of potent antimicrobial agent by Actinomycetes, Streptomyces sannanensis strain SU118 isolated from phoomdi in Loktak Lake of Manipur, India. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:278.

Gebreyohannes G, Moges F, Sahile S, Raja N. Isolation and characterization of potential antibiotic producing Actinomycetes from water and sediments of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(6):426-35.

Tawiah A, Gbedema S, Adu F, Boamah V, Annan K. Antibiotic producing microorganisms from River Wiwi, Lake Bosomtwe and the Gulf of Guinea at Doakor Sea Beach, Ghana. BioMed Cent Microbiol. 2012;12(1):1-8.

Van der Meij A, Worsley SF, Hutchings MI, van Wezel GP. Chemical ecology of antibiotic production by Actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41(3):392-416.

Selvin J, Shanmughapriya S, Gandhimathi R, Seghal Kiran G, Rajeetha Ravji T, Natarajaseenivasan K et al. Optimization and production of novel antimicrobial agents from sponge associated marine Actinomycetes Nocardiopsis dassonvillei MAD08. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;83(3):435-45.

Yaradoddi JS, Kontro MH. Actinobacteria: basic adaptation to harsh environments. In Actinobacteria: Ecology, Diversity, Classification and Extensive Applications," Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 2022;69-88.

Lertcanawanichakul M, Sahabuddeen T. Characterization of Streptomyces sp. KB1 and its cultural optimization for bioactive compounds production. PeerJ. 2023;11:e14909.

De Simeis D, Serra S. Actinomyces: A never-ending source of bioactive compounds—an overview on antibiotics production. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(5):483.

Sarika K, Sampath G, Kaveriyappan Govindarajan R, Ameen F, Alwakeel S, Al Gwaiz HI et al. Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of soil Actinomycetes isolated from coal mine sites. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(6):3553-8.

Rafieenia R. Effect of nutrients and culture conditions on antibiotic synthesis in Streptomycetes. Asian J Pharm Health Sci. 2013;3(3):810-5.

Escalante L, Ramos I, Imriskova I, Langley E, Sanchez S. Glucose repression of anthracycline formation in Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;52(4):572-8.

Brückner R, Titgemeyer F. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: choice of the carbon source and auto-regulatory limitation of sugar utilization. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;209(2):141-8.

Romero-Rodríguez A, Maldonado-Carmona N, Ruiz-Villafán B, Koirala N, Rocha D, Sánchez S. Interplay between carbon, nitrogen and phosphate utilization in the control of secondary metabolite production in Streptomyces. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111(5):761-81.

Sánchez S, Chávez A, Forero A, García-Huante Y, Romero A, Sánchez M et al. Carbon source regulation of antibiotic production. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2010;63(8): 442-59.